Friday, October 31, 2008
Favorite Holiday
My favorite holiday is Christmas, of course because I get all kinds of gifts. Also I get to see all my family members that i haven't seen since last year.
Monday, October 27, 2008
Frustration
Things that frustrate me are when i am playing a first person shooter like Call of Duty World at War and i keep dying because when i spawn there are people right in front me to kill me.
Friday, October 24, 2008
South Charleston
Today we play the number 1 team in the state, South Charleston. It is at South Charleston at 7:00. Lets see how it goes down.
Monday, October 20, 2008
Weekend
This weekend I went to Lincoln County for the football game which we won barely in OT. Then I went to Seth Kelly's house for a Halloween party. He had a haunted trail and I helped in it.
Friday, October 17, 2008
VOTE
I would vote for John Mccain if i had the chance. Because, Sen. Barack Obama is a ballyhoo and an imbecile. One of the first facts we should face is that Obama's "I'm right and you're wrong" attitude is empty-headed because it leaves no room for compromise. Some people think that I, speaking as someone who is not an insensate scapegrace, oppose, deplore, and disavow discrimination, extremism, and hatred of every kind. Others believe that there is no defense against ridicule. The truth lies somewhere in between, namely, that this is not Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, where the state would be eager to disguise the complexity of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and sexual identity in the construction and practice of metagrobolism. Not yet, at least. But Obama's myrmidons suspect that mercantalism is a noble goal. This is precisely the non-equation that Obama is trying to patch together. What he's missing, as usual, is that I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that proposes that violence and prejudice are funny. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing.
Those of you who thought that Obama was finally going to leave us alone are in for a big surprise because Obama recently announced his plans to effectuate the downfall of all that is decent and civilized. Taking that notion one step further, we can see that he uses big words like "phytopaleontological" to make himself sound important. For that matter, benevolent Nature has equipped another puny creature, the skunk, with a means of making itself seem important, too. Although Obama's half-measures may reek like a skunk, when I'm through with Obama he'll think twice before attempting to reopen wounds that seem scarcely healed. An inner voice tells me that the question that's on everyone's mind these days is, "What accounts for his prodigious criminality and dissipation?" In classic sophist fashion, I ask another question in reply: What exactly is the principle that rationalizes his nutty opinions? That happens to be a matter on which I do not care to venture either an opinion or a guess. I do, however, feel that I should state that I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind Obama that his cheerleaders are too lazy to question his authority. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that Obama's victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Obama's trucklers, who loudly proclaim that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that Obama can dole out or retract. Regardless of those crafty proclamations, the truth is that he periodically puts up a facade of reform. However, underneath the pretty surface, it's always business as usual.
Obama keeps saying that sin is good for the soul. Isn't that claim getting a little shopworn? I mean, he intends to create a new social class. Voluble dipsomaniacs, vainglorious couch potatoes, and loquacious fomenters of revolution will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their co-conspirators. Experience should probably indicate that in his quest to overthrow democratic political systems he has left no destructive scheme unutilized. Okay, now it's time to offend a few people. Actually, I hope not to offend anyone, although one of the great mysteries of modern life is, Will peeling back the onion of Obama's petty, virulent activities cause Obama to shed tears or will it merely enhance his desire to undermine the basic values of work, responsibility, and family? I'll tell you what I think the answer is. I can't prove it, but if I'm correct, events soon will prove me right. I think that I, not being one of the many mean-spirited nabobs of revanchism of this world, feel no more personal hatred for him than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them.
As I have indicated, before Obama once again claims that you and I are morally inferior to mephitic fence-sitters, he should do some real research rather than simply play a game of bias reinforcement with his advocates. True, I have no interest in getting tangled in the rhetoric or dogma that he frequently pushes, but any rational argument must acknowledge this. His unbridled claims, naturally, do not. Even if Obama's facts were reliable, they were gathered selectively and then manipulated towards favored conclusions. Here, too, we can see how if I were elected Ruler of the World, my first act of business would be to do something about the continuing -- make that the escalating -- effort on Obama's part to make us the helpless puppets of our demographic labels. I would further use my position to inform certain segments of the Earth's population that I have a problem with Obama's use of the phrase, "We all know that...". With this phrase, he doesn't need to prove his claim that drugged-out nitwits are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive; he merely accepts it as fact. To put it another way, many people think of his termagant litanies as a joke, as something only half-serious. In fact, they're deadly serious. They're the tool by which self-righteous lackwits will scar little children's self-image in the coming days. A second all-too-serious item is that Obama counts callow ninnies as his friends. Unfortunately for him, these are hired friends, false friends, friends incapable of realizing for a moment that Obama is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks.
If Obama's cultists get their way, society as we know it will cease to exist. There's nothing controversial about that view. It's a fact, pure and simple. It was a fact long before anyone realized that we should not concern ourselves with Obama's putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and with the fact that Obama's associates tend to fall into the mistaken belief that the moon is made of green cheese, mainly because they live inside an Obama-generated illusion-world and talk only with each other. I, speaking as someone who is not a dirty pedant, find Obama's op-ed pieces rather jaded, don't you? All the same, Obama is conversant only with those things in which his own interests are concerned. To cap that off, what we have been imparting to Obama -- or what he has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge.
If I am correct that malignant, unruly lounge lizards have no business here, then like most people that have a power-hungry agenda to advocate, he wants to encourage the acceptance of scapegoating and demonization. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on his ill-bred refrains. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because most people don't realize that Obama has already revealed his plans to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos. He revealed these plans in a manifesto bearing all of the hallmarks of having been written by a churlish evildoer. Not only is his manifesto entirely lacking in logic, relentlessly subjective, and totally anecdotal, but Obama believes that we can stop lexiphanicism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for randy renegades. Unfortunately, as long as he believes such absurdities, he will continue to commit atrocities. Some day, Obama's scary, cocky janissaries may ask you why you think it's a good idea to solve the problems of scapegoatism, particularism, economic inequality, and lack of equal opportunity. If you're too stunned to answer immediately they'll answer for you, probably stating that hanging out with sinister bludgers is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. You should therefore be prepared to tell these dictatorial cowards that when Obama tells us that the most self-centered palookas you'll ever see should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fund-raisers, he somehow fails to mention that his diatribes stink of cover-ups, stalls, diversionary tactics, legal maneuverings, and other measures that make excessive use of foul language. He fails to mention that he dismisses his critics as either servants of an existing power structure or as suffering from false consciousness. And he fails to mention that even his allies are afraid that he will mute the voice of anyone who dares to speak out against him in the near future. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again and it is further evidence that Obama has allowed himself to become a spokesman for the same point of view shared by childish wankers, amoral, cold-blooded tax cheats, and devious, unctuous blackguards while masquerading as an outspoken radical bucking the system.
By increasing society's cycle of hostility and violence, Obama has erected a monument to Jacobinism. Only it does not seem proper to say that such a thing has been "created". "Excreted", "belched", "spewed", and "spat out" are expressions more appropriate to the object here described. You see, Obama's sappy dream is starting to come true. Liberties are being killed by attrition. Stalinism is being installed by accretion. The only way that we can reverse these unprofessional, arrogant trends is to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy. To be precise, there are some hideous, eccentric usurers who are manipulative. There are also some who are longiloquent. Which category does Obama fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both".
Obama likes to quote all of the saccharine, sticky moralisms about "human rights" and the evils of statism. But as soon as we stop paying attention, he invariably instructs his gofers to perpetrate acts of the most abusive character. Then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning. Though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual it makes perfect sense in light of Obama's spineless complaints. Either he has no real conception of the sweep of history, or he is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context. Obama just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to take advantage of human fallibility to generate an epidemic of corruption and social unrest." His protégés are quick to point out that because he is hated, persecuted, and repeatedly laughed at, Obama is the real victim here. The truth is that, if anything, Obama is a victim of his own success -- a success that enables Obama to confuse the catastrophic power of state fascism with the repression of an authoritarian government in our minds.
Obama wants to produce an army of mindless insects who will obey his every command. To produce such an army, he plans to destroy people's minds using either drugs or an advanced form of lobotomy. Whichever approach he takes, there is a proper place in life for hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool. But when Obama perverts hatred in order to foster suspicion -- if not hatred -- of "outsiders", it becomes clear that he insists that he can walk on water. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. Do you ever get the feeling that Obama lives in a mental and emotional la-la land? Well, you should because Obama owes us all an apology. In reaching that conclusion I have made the usual assumption that he holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden City -- sterile obstacles to progress who use rock music, with its savage, tribal, orgiastic beat, to make conditions far worse than could ever have been the case without Obama's predatory efforts.
Unfortunately, Obama's wanton, fatuitous expedients neglect to take one important factor into consideration: human nature. If you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that I'm sure Obama wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on his conversations. So why does he want to obstruct important things? Personally, I don't believe the answer has anything to do with resistentialism. Rather, I believe it involves Obama's tendency to hurt people's feelings. Don't be intimidated by his threat to require religious services around the world to begin with "Obama is great; Obama is good; we thank Obama for our daily food". Although I respect his right to free speech just as I respect it for brassbound paper-pushers, predaceous goofballs, and irrational insurrectionists, I find it necessary, if I am to meet my reader on something like a common ground of understanding, to point out that Obama will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let him criticize other people's beliefs, fashion sense, and lifestyle. At least putting up with another Barack Obama hissy fit is easier than convincing Obama's understrappers that Obama pompously claims that a totalitarian dictatorship is the best form of government we could possibly have. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately. The take-away message of this letter is that Sen. Barack Obama has abandoned ethics altogether. Think about it. I don't want to have to write another letter a few years from now, in the wake of a society torn apart by Obama's ostentatious, stolid hypnopompic insights, reminding you that you were warned.
Those of you who thought that Obama was finally going to leave us alone are in for a big surprise because Obama recently announced his plans to effectuate the downfall of all that is decent and civilized. Taking that notion one step further, we can see that he uses big words like "phytopaleontological" to make himself sound important. For that matter, benevolent Nature has equipped another puny creature, the skunk, with a means of making itself seem important, too. Although Obama's half-measures may reek like a skunk, when I'm through with Obama he'll think twice before attempting to reopen wounds that seem scarcely healed. An inner voice tells me that the question that's on everyone's mind these days is, "What accounts for his prodigious criminality and dissipation?" In classic sophist fashion, I ask another question in reply: What exactly is the principle that rationalizes his nutty opinions? That happens to be a matter on which I do not care to venture either an opinion or a guess. I do, however, feel that I should state that I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind Obama that his cheerleaders are too lazy to question his authority. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that Obama's victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Obama's trucklers, who loudly proclaim that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that Obama can dole out or retract. Regardless of those crafty proclamations, the truth is that he periodically puts up a facade of reform. However, underneath the pretty surface, it's always business as usual.
Obama keeps saying that sin is good for the soul. Isn't that claim getting a little shopworn? I mean, he intends to create a new social class. Voluble dipsomaniacs, vainglorious couch potatoes, and loquacious fomenters of revolution will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their co-conspirators. Experience should probably indicate that in his quest to overthrow democratic political systems he has left no destructive scheme unutilized. Okay, now it's time to offend a few people. Actually, I hope not to offend anyone, although one of the great mysteries of modern life is, Will peeling back the onion of Obama's petty, virulent activities cause Obama to shed tears or will it merely enhance his desire to undermine the basic values of work, responsibility, and family? I'll tell you what I think the answer is. I can't prove it, but if I'm correct, events soon will prove me right. I think that I, not being one of the many mean-spirited nabobs of revanchism of this world, feel no more personal hatred for him than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them.
As I have indicated, before Obama once again claims that you and I are morally inferior to mephitic fence-sitters, he should do some real research rather than simply play a game of bias reinforcement with his advocates. True, I have no interest in getting tangled in the rhetoric or dogma that he frequently pushes, but any rational argument must acknowledge this. His unbridled claims, naturally, do not. Even if Obama's facts were reliable, they were gathered selectively and then manipulated towards favored conclusions. Here, too, we can see how if I were elected Ruler of the World, my first act of business would be to do something about the continuing -- make that the escalating -- effort on Obama's part to make us the helpless puppets of our demographic labels. I would further use my position to inform certain segments of the Earth's population that I have a problem with Obama's use of the phrase, "We all know that...". With this phrase, he doesn't need to prove his claim that drugged-out nitwits are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive; he merely accepts it as fact. To put it another way, many people think of his termagant litanies as a joke, as something only half-serious. In fact, they're deadly serious. They're the tool by which self-righteous lackwits will scar little children's self-image in the coming days. A second all-too-serious item is that Obama counts callow ninnies as his friends. Unfortunately for him, these are hired friends, false friends, friends incapable of realizing for a moment that Obama is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks.
If Obama's cultists get their way, society as we know it will cease to exist. There's nothing controversial about that view. It's a fact, pure and simple. It was a fact long before anyone realized that we should not concern ourselves with Obama's putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and with the fact that Obama's associates tend to fall into the mistaken belief that the moon is made of green cheese, mainly because they live inside an Obama-generated illusion-world and talk only with each other. I, speaking as someone who is not a dirty pedant, find Obama's op-ed pieces rather jaded, don't you? All the same, Obama is conversant only with those things in which his own interests are concerned. To cap that off, what we have been imparting to Obama -- or what he has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge.
If I am correct that malignant, unruly lounge lizards have no business here, then like most people that have a power-hungry agenda to advocate, he wants to encourage the acceptance of scapegoating and demonization. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on his ill-bred refrains. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because most people don't realize that Obama has already revealed his plans to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos. He revealed these plans in a manifesto bearing all of the hallmarks of having been written by a churlish evildoer. Not only is his manifesto entirely lacking in logic, relentlessly subjective, and totally anecdotal, but Obama believes that we can stop lexiphanicism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for randy renegades. Unfortunately, as long as he believes such absurdities, he will continue to commit atrocities. Some day, Obama's scary, cocky janissaries may ask you why you think it's a good idea to solve the problems of scapegoatism, particularism, economic inequality, and lack of equal opportunity. If you're too stunned to answer immediately they'll answer for you, probably stating that hanging out with sinister bludgers is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. You should therefore be prepared to tell these dictatorial cowards that when Obama tells us that the most self-centered palookas you'll ever see should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fund-raisers, he somehow fails to mention that his diatribes stink of cover-ups, stalls, diversionary tactics, legal maneuverings, and other measures that make excessive use of foul language. He fails to mention that he dismisses his critics as either servants of an existing power structure or as suffering from false consciousness. And he fails to mention that even his allies are afraid that he will mute the voice of anyone who dares to speak out against him in the near future. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again and it is further evidence that Obama has allowed himself to become a spokesman for the same point of view shared by childish wankers, amoral, cold-blooded tax cheats, and devious, unctuous blackguards while masquerading as an outspoken radical bucking the system.
By increasing society's cycle of hostility and violence, Obama has erected a monument to Jacobinism. Only it does not seem proper to say that such a thing has been "created". "Excreted", "belched", "spewed", and "spat out" are expressions more appropriate to the object here described. You see, Obama's sappy dream is starting to come true. Liberties are being killed by attrition. Stalinism is being installed by accretion. The only way that we can reverse these unprofessional, arrogant trends is to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy. To be precise, there are some hideous, eccentric usurers who are manipulative. There are also some who are longiloquent. Which category does Obama fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both".
Obama likes to quote all of the saccharine, sticky moralisms about "human rights" and the evils of statism. But as soon as we stop paying attention, he invariably instructs his gofers to perpetrate acts of the most abusive character. Then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning. Though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual it makes perfect sense in light of Obama's spineless complaints. Either he has no real conception of the sweep of history, or he is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context. Obama just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to take advantage of human fallibility to generate an epidemic of corruption and social unrest." His protégés are quick to point out that because he is hated, persecuted, and repeatedly laughed at, Obama is the real victim here. The truth is that, if anything, Obama is a victim of his own success -- a success that enables Obama to confuse the catastrophic power of state fascism with the repression of an authoritarian government in our minds.
Obama wants to produce an army of mindless insects who will obey his every command. To produce such an army, he plans to destroy people's minds using either drugs or an advanced form of lobotomy. Whichever approach he takes, there is a proper place in life for hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool. But when Obama perverts hatred in order to foster suspicion -- if not hatred -- of "outsiders", it becomes clear that he insists that he can walk on water. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. Do you ever get the feeling that Obama lives in a mental and emotional la-la land? Well, you should because Obama owes us all an apology. In reaching that conclusion I have made the usual assumption that he holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden City -- sterile obstacles to progress who use rock music, with its savage, tribal, orgiastic beat, to make conditions far worse than could ever have been the case without Obama's predatory efforts.
Unfortunately, Obama's wanton, fatuitous expedients neglect to take one important factor into consideration: human nature. If you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that I'm sure Obama wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on his conversations. So why does he want to obstruct important things? Personally, I don't believe the answer has anything to do with resistentialism. Rather, I believe it involves Obama's tendency to hurt people's feelings. Don't be intimidated by his threat to require religious services around the world to begin with "Obama is great; Obama is good; we thank Obama for our daily food". Although I respect his right to free speech just as I respect it for brassbound paper-pushers, predaceous goofballs, and irrational insurrectionists, I find it necessary, if I am to meet my reader on something like a common ground of understanding, to point out that Obama will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let him criticize other people's beliefs, fashion sense, and lifestyle. At least putting up with another Barack Obama hissy fit is easier than convincing Obama's understrappers that Obama pompously claims that a totalitarian dictatorship is the best form of government we could possibly have. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately. The take-away message of this letter is that Sen. Barack Obama has abandoned ethics altogether. Think about it. I don't want to have to write another letter a few years from now, in the wake of a society torn apart by Obama's ostentatious, stolid hypnopompic insights, reminding you that you were warned.
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Favorite Movie
My favorite movie is probably Step Brothers because Will Ferrell is the best actor alive. I honestly cried because it was so funny. I like any movie with Will Ferrell and Adam Sandler though.
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Favorite TV show
My favorite T.V. show is easily Family Guy. I am laughing nonstop no matter what episode it is. I record it ever night just so i dont miss an episode. I dont know what i would do if there wasnt a tv show like Family Guy
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
My favorite computer game
My favorite computer game would definitly have to be World of Warcraft. I used to play this game nonstop until i started playing Call of Duty 4. I liked it so much because i could play with my friends and it was just so addicting. I would have to say that Call of Duty is my favorite game of all time though.
Monday, October 13, 2008
Board Gane
My favorite board game would have to be Monopoly. I can play it til the end everytime which is a great accomplishment considering that most of the games take about 4 hrs or more. Monopoly makes me happy because its something else to do besides play video games and football.
Friday, October 3, 2008
Game 5
We play George Washington today at 7:30. We are playing at Laidley Field. We practiced at Marshall Monday so we could get used to a turf field. I think we can win this week hopefully we do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)